close
close
Local

Law banning sale of some cannabis-related products goes into effect, but won't stop all legal highs • Nebraska Examiner

As of today, several varieties of intoxicating hemp products are illegal to sell or produce in the state of South Dakota.

That doesn't necessarily put them out of reach for South Dakotans.

Nor does it mean the death of the alternative intoxicant market that emerged in South Dakota and across the country, thanks in part to a loophole in the 2018 federal farm bill that legalized hemp.

Even if all of the products now banned by the South Dakota legislature's action last winter are removed from state store shelves — an open question as the law goes into effect — shoppers can buy them online without fear of repercussions because their possession is not prohibited by the new law.

The law targets synthetically produced delta-8, delta-9, delta-10, THC-O, THC-P and HHC. Both compounds are chemical cousins ​​of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the euphoric compound found in cannabis flowers.

Sellers or producers of hemp-derived products could be charged with a Class 2 misdemeanor — the state's lowest-level felony, punishable by up to 30 days in jail.

But the tests needed to prove a product violates the law have limits and require waiting periods for local law enforcement to comply. The state's largest police agencies have no immediate plans to prioritize enforcement.

This places the onus on retailers to comply with a law that would reduce their revenues or force them out of business.

A federal lawsuit filed by Hemp Quarters 605, a Pierre-based company, is also pending. The company has tried to block the new law by calling it unconstitutional and interfering with interstate commerce permitted under the federal farm bill. But U.S. District Judge Eric Schulte declined to issue a preliminary injunction.

However, even without the injunction, the company's lawsuit will continue and could eventually overturn the law.

Caleb Rose of Rapid City owns Black Hills Vapors and recently founded a trade group called South Dakota Retailers for Better Alternatives to advocate for stores that sell hemp-derived products.

Rose said he plans to remove the targeted products from the shelves of his West River stores, but the lack of certainty could mean other retailers choose to ignore the new law.

“I think everybody in town and everybody in the state is going to have to make their own decisions and consult with their attorneys about what they want to do,” Rose said.

Complications related to testing

Law enforcement issues are tied to product testing. A box of candy on a retailer's shelf might say “delta-8,” but prosecutors will have to prove the product is illegal beyond a reasonable doubt.

That requires testing, which means a waiting period for local law enforcement and prosecutors for newly illegal substances. There are field tests for some felony-level narcotics like methamphetamine, and some agencies can test for the active ingredient in traditional marijuana, but there are no such tests for products like hemp gummies or delta-8 vape pens. For those products, law enforcement would rely on the state Department of Health’s lab.

This lab can distinguish between delta-8, delta-9 and delta-10 THC, according to spokeswoman Tia Kafka.

But there is no test that can prove for sure whether the chemicals in a particular product are naturally occurring or synthetic. To violate the new law, the chemical in question must have been altered from its original state. In theory, products containing high levels of chemicals would be legal if they were naturally occurring.

According to Kafka, this should not stop police from taking enforcement action. Delta-8 is only found in small amounts in nature, so Kafka said high levels of these compounds would be enough to show that they have been modified and are therefore illegal to sell.

Even if a product claims to contain unadulterated, unadulterated delta-8, Kafka writes that testing can help triangulate the origin of an intoxicant.

Products containing synthetically produced hemp chemicals “often contain contaminants from the chemical reaction, which can indicate that a product is not 100% natural,” Kafka said.

The legalization of hemp and medical marijuana has already slowed the pace of cannabis testing at the state lab. In 2020, the state conducted 807 cannabis tests. Last year, the lab conducted 99.

“Following the legalization of industrial hemp and medical cannabis, state laws have changed significantly, leading to reduced cannabis testing,” she said.

Law enforcement awaits instructions

It's unclear whether the new law will increase law enforcement interest in lab testing, but agencies have given no indication that enforcement will become a priority.

Law enforcement decisions are made at the local level, Attorney General Marty Jackley said.

There are no plans to push the state to investigate hemp stores or products just because they are sold in hundreds of stores, he said.

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley and Moody County Sheriff Troy Wellman speak to reporters after a hearing in Flandreau on June 20, 2024. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight)

No business can be searched or randomly inspected for compliance with the law without probable cause and a warrant, he said.

“What I can tell you is the Legislature has taken some action. It has made certain conduct illegal,” Jackley said. “Law enforcement's job is to enforce those rules. We're not doing anything special about it.”

In the Hemp Quarters 605 lawsuit, court records show that the Hughes County State's Attorney's Office does not intend to immediately prosecute the company's owners for violations of the new law.

Sioux Falls Police Department spokesman Sam Clemens said his agency is awaiting guidance from the Minnehaha County State's Attorney's Office on what types of enforcement actions it might need to take to enforce the new crime.

Minnehaha County District Attorney Daniel Haggar, however, has not provided guidance on how the law will be implemented. He told South Dakota Searchlight that his office will evaluate all cases brought to police to determine whether prosecution is warranted.

Katy Urban, a spokeswoman for the Pennington County District Attorney's Office, gave a similar response via email. She wrote that Rapid City prosecutors will review the merits of any case brought to them by the police department.

Rapid City Police Department spokesman Brendyn Medina said his agency is awaiting enforcement guidance from the Pennington County State's Attorney's Office.

Even though law enforcement is aggressively investigating the sale of new illegal products, there are still many other opportunities for legal drug use for both sellers and consumers.

Other non-hemp products include kratom, kava and magic mushroom hallucinogens, the latter of which are produced from different mushrooms derived from psilocybin, a mushroom that is federally illegal. Certain categories of hemp-derived soft drinks, available at bars, restaurants and grocery stores in the state, will also remain available.

Joshua Williston runs a Chasing Clouds vape and tobacco store in Sioux Falls and said late last week that he would remove the now-banned products from shelves by July 1. Chasing Clouds is a chain of stores and he said anything not sold that is illegal today will be shipped for sale in states without the ban.

Williston expects customers who relied on those products to get medical marijuana cards, buy recreational marijuana on the black market or find other ways to get high.

“It’s probably going to slow down business, but it’s not going to stop,” Williston said. “It’s going to pick up in other areas because once it’s no longer an option, people will just find other solutions to replace it.”

Sponsor: Federal solution needed

Rep. Brian Mulder, a Republican from Sioux Falls, is the lead sponsor of the new law. He told South Dakota Searchlight that he understands the practical limitations of his bill, but hopes most retailers will reduce the supply of cannabis-like intoxicants by complying with the law.

He’s also optimistic because of ongoing discussions in Washington, D.C., over the next federal farm bill. Congress has been debating the next version of that bill for more than a year, and a provision added by the U.S. House Agriculture Committee in May aims to close the loophole that created the market by legally distinguishing between hemp grown for chemical extraction and hemp grown to produce things like food or fiber.

Rep. Brian Mulder, R-Sioux Falls, speaks in the House of Representatives on Jan. 17, 2024. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)

Congress has already extended the deadline for passing the farm bill once. The deadline for passage is now set for September.

“No matter how quickly this bill passes, it may be pointless for us here in South Dakota to try to fix anything else,” Mulder said.

Requests for comment sent to the three members of South Dakota's congressional delegation on the farm bill and hemp went unanswered.

Mulder, who works with an organization called Volunteers of America that provides chemical dependency services, said South Dakota lawmakers want to do what he believes the federal government intended to do with the 2018 farm bill.

Federal authorities had no intention of legalizing weed by creating a loophole, he said.

“We were trying to come up with something that was in line with the real intent of the 2018 farm bill, where hemp products were sold for fiber, fabric, building materials and some therapeutic products made with CBD,” he said.

This article was first published in the South Dakota Spotlighta sister site to the Nebraska Examiner in the States Newsroom network.

Related Articles

Back to top button